Listen To The Show

Transcript

Welcome to The Brief by Kuro House, your daily shot of sharp insights and big ideas from the world of marketing. Today, we’re diving into a mix of cutting-edge AI, the changing face of advertising in streaming, and the real costs behind that generative AI hype. Let’s get right to the stories making waves in the last 24 hours.

First up, Pandora, the jewelry giant, is taking a bold leap into AI-powered customer service and emotional selling, as reported by Glossy. Pandora’s not just using AI to cut costs—they’re using it to transform the entire shopping experience, especially during the high-stakes holiday season. Earlier this year, they launched Clara, an AI chatbot that now resolves about 60% of customer service inquiries, up from 40% with their previous bot. Notably, Clara’s presence has boosted Pandora’s net promoter score by 10%, showing that efficiency and customer satisfaction don’t have to be at odds. But the real moonshot is Gemma, an AI sales agent being tested in Australia. Gemma’s goal is to replicate the nuanced, emotionally driven conversations that happen in-store—think asking about the story behind a gift, or the memories a piece of jewelry should represent. If a shopper opts in, Gemma chats with them about the recipient, occasion, and meaning, narrowing down product suggestions with context, much like a skilled associate would. This isn’t just about selling charms; it’s about selling memories, and Pandora is betting that AI can capture the sentiment and intent that usually gets lost online. With 23% of sales already digital and rising, Pandora sees conversational AI as the next big frontier. Clara is already stabilizing operations during peak periods, and if Gemma succeeds, it could fundamentally reshape how Pandora connects with customers year-round. As CTO David Walmsley put it: “Selling more jewelry to happier customers is the point.”

Switching gears to the world of streaming, Digiday brings us a fascinating look at Rembrand, a company aiming to revolutionize virtual ad placements. CEO Omar Tawakol is pushing to make advertising in streaming environments less intrusive and more scalable. Rembrand uses neural inverse rendering—essentially, AI-driven digital insertion—to seamlessly place sponsored products or virtual billboards into movies, shows, and influencer content. This isn’t about negotiating whether an actor should sip Pepsi in a scene; instead, Rembrand’s model focuses on virtual out-of-home advertising, like billboards in cityscapes between scenes. This approach is already huge in markets like Asia, South Africa, and the Middle East, where up to 10% of TV ad budgets go to these placements. The beauty is that these billboards don’t interfere with actors or storylines, so they’re easy to scale and sell programmatically. In the U.S., 96% of Rembrand’s insertions last quarter were virtual outdoor billboards, and Tawakol believes this model can change the economics of streaming by increasing ad revenue without upping the ad load. The ultimate goal? To let viewers enjoy content with fewer interruptions, while streamers and advertisers still profit—a win-win that could redefine the streaming ad experience.

But as marketers flock to generative AI for content creation, Digiday cautions that hidden costs are lurking beneath the surface. The promise is clear: cut weeks of production down to hours, save money, and scale up. Yet, the reality is more complicated. According to an October Gartner survey, 58% of marketers are using generative AI for content, but building a semi-automated system—like Unilever’s—can take over a year. There’s the upfront investment in legal, tech, and brand training, plus the challenge of finding top AI talent, which is in short supply. Then there’s the cost of AI usage itself: companies like OpenAI sell credits for advanced features, and heavy usage can quietly rack up expenses—Coca-Cola’s Christmas ad, for example, used 70,000 prompts. Legal risks are also top of mind, with copyright battles ongoing and agencies embedding compliance checks to protect clients. Perhaps most surprising, the real bottleneck is now human: approvals and reviews take just as long as ever, even if the content is generated in minutes. As one expert put it, “AI collapses the time it takes to make content but it does nothing to collapse the time it takes to approve the content.” The upshot? Marketers need to rethink not just production, but their entire creative workflow to realize AI’s true promise.

That’s all for today’s Brief. From AI-powered emotional selling to the quiet revolution in streaming ads, and the real-world challenges of generative AI, it’s clear that technology is transforming marketing—but not always in the ways we expect. Thanks for listening, and remember: staying sharp means looking beyond the hype to see the real story. Catch you tomorrow.